Thứ Năm, 20 tháng 2, 2014

"Like to the Museum Long bien bridge, they must keep in shape, the original function".

-Shipping traffic machine that has just launched 3 new construction projects and the preservation of the Long bien bridge. The opinion of Prof. About this? GS. Ngoc Khue Lü BU: The deck of the transportation and the Hanoi PEOPLE'S COMMITTEE launched 3 new construction projects and the Long bien bridge near here is a job extremely obliged both to the Museum bridge girl will have to develop the railway and public transport serving on a heavy traffic jam.

Need to understand that, go to this step, it contacted the Hanoi PEOPLE'S COMMITTEE and transported over nearly a dozen years with a lot of different alternatives and recommendations.

The first option was introduced as an urban railway bridge is 50 metres. However, if doing so would make the architectural space broke, heavy stress in key municipalities so that projects are not satisfied.

Then, transfer to another as do railway bridge the city moved up 186 yards to the North. This approach would have to break the many from Coal through Bean Row Boots to Nguyen Trung Truc.

On the other hand, the release of premises at the "golden land", has yet to be counted. The masses here were living longer and also close the space, so also does not concur with this approach, over the years, so far unresolved.

Contact the machine has just launched 3 new projects to build and the Long bien bridge Photo. : The Internet. -Recently, representatives of the Department of transportation of communications stated that should the Museum as is the bridge, parallel tuning, upgrade the server to load traffic.

However, the problem posed here is if the Museum about museums for how true, ladies GS? While there are many different views, I think we have to find a way to come to agreement. Wish so, should be based on the principle, also if we are conversing without working very hard'll guidelines conclude. My personal opinion is that the Museum should not contradict development.

So are encrusted how between the conservation and development of living with each other, not because of that sacrifice, but because of the development of that sacrifice conservation.

The second problem, when a Museum object, to conserve space, shape, texture, but is important to the Museum the right functionality and the features. We like the aspect ratio preservation of Hoi An ancient town, the inhabitants still live there, still born child, business.

Not just for the palisade or view outside such new Museum value. Or the preservation of a temple, then still let people to the ceremony rather than one Palisade for fear of damage to the. In other words, the Museum must do so that objects "live" is not making it "fuck you. " Here, it is the bridge to the Museum first, then it must be the bridge.

The bridge is used for communication. Here's contact city. Things to emphasize that this was a railway bridge.

In 1902, when the inauguration just to run the vessel railways. Both sides have people railing deck; then, over 10 years, the new French open on the chicken wings are the way for light automobiles. We now preserve it must hold true function is the bridge. Keep the power for both the railway and the motor vehicle and engine light. If not so, it is no longer the Long bien bridge before. The third principle is that we pledge up to keep are shapes, beauty and space.

This of course we have to do that from the export see option number 2 which is the machine traffic carried and the Hanoi PEOPLE'S COMMITTEE put forward is very sensible. The railway still operates, light motor vehicles still travel through and still build with the look of steel truss as the old days.

So, overall is still the Long bien bridge as before. Still the old location, function, function, looks like the old status quo. So why tell this is not the Long bien bridge again?. -However, if such preservation, many comments e feared lost count "neck" of the bridge.

PROF. Say about this? In my opinion, does what no other ancient traits at all, because the situation remains unchanged. Many now view that unmolested and keep the status quo of the current bridge. However, if the status quo the existing bridge is also the Long bien bridge again?. Long bien bridge the old days longer than 1,600 metres with 19. After a century of war and were used heavily, so half of the beat (10 rhythms have been completely vandalized).

9, rhythm 2 rhythm of 6 and 8 were undermining one part, are reinforcing. Moreover, the current remaining spans 9 more space being rusty. The head office was also damaged.

Beats are listed with the interim head. So if the current bridge status quo then this is not the Long bien bridge. That's what people connect, patchwork from the fragments of time and remaining war rather than the Long bien bridge which we desire as what's inherent in 1967 that examined first.

For as there is an ancient temple collapsed by more than half to go, the rest are severely degraded, if not the entire restoration that preserved the ruins so that that it is the preservation of the ancient temple is incorrect.

Up, if said preserving the Long bien bridge must practice option 2 as the Ministry of transportation and the Hanoi PEOPLE'S COMMITTEE has recommended. -Thank you GS about the conversation! Chun Tung-(done).

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét